@article{ATM13581,
author = {William P. Boyan Jr and Daniel Lavy Lavy and Anthony Dinallo and Javier Otero and Annelie Roding and Dustin Hanos and Roy Dressner and Michael Arvanitis},
title = {Lighted ureteral stents in laparoscopic colorectal surgery; a five-year experience},
journal = {Annals of Translational Medicine},
volume = {5},
number = {3},
year = {2017},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Background: Ureteral injuries during colorectal surgery are a rare event, ranging in the literature from 0.28–7.6%. Debate surrounds the use of prophylactic lighted ureteral stents to help protect the ureter during laparoscopic surgery. It has been suggested that they help to identify injuries but do not prevent them. The authors look to challenge this.
Methods: Over 66 months, every laparoscopic or colectomy involving ureteral stents was recorded. Researchers documented any injury to the ureter intraoperatively. The chart was also reviewed for the complications of urinary tract infection (UTI) and urinary retention post-operatively.
Results: During the 66 months, 402 laparoscopic colon resections were done. There were no ureteral injuries. The lighted ureteral stent was identified during every case in the effort to prevent injury during dissection and resection. No catheter associated UTIs were identified, while 14 (3.5%) suffered from post-operative urinary retention.
Conclusions: The authors of this study present a large series of colon resections with no intraoperative ureteral injuries. In addition, these catheters were not associated with any UTIs and a rate of urinary retention similar to that of the at large data. This series provides compelling data to use lighted ureteral stents during laparoscopic colon surgery.},
issn = {2305-5847}, url = {https://atm.amegroups.org/article/view/13581}
}