@article{ATM13631,
author = {Sebastian Mafeld and Craig Nesbitt and James McCaslin and Alan Bagnall and Philip Davey and Pentop Bose and Rob Williams},
title = {Three-dimensional (3D) printed endovascular simulation models: a feasibility study},
journal = {Annals of Translational Medicine},
volume = {5},
number = {3},
year = {2017},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a manufacturing process in which an object is created by specialist printers designed to print in additive layers to create a 3D object. Whilst there are initial promising medical applications of 3D printing, a lack of evidence to support its use remains a barrier for larger scale adoption into clinical practice. Endovascular virtual reality (VR) simulation plays an important role in the safe training of future endovascular practitioners, but existing VR models have disadvantages including cost and accessibility which could be addressed with 3D printing.
Methods: This study sought to evaluate the feasibility of 3D printing an anatomically accurate human aorta for the purposes of endovascular training.
Results: A 3D printed model was successfully designed and printed and used for endovascular simulation. The stages of development and practical applications are described. Feedback from 96 physicians who answered a series of questions using a 5 point Likert scale is presented.
Conclusions: Initial data supports the value of 3D printed endovascular models although further educational validation is required.},
issn = {2305-5847}, url = {https://atm.amegroups.org/article/view/13631}
}