How to cite item

Should copyright be transferred before a manuscript is accepted?

  
@article{ATM16103,
	author = {Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva},
	title = {Should copyright be transferred before a manuscript is accepted?},
	journal = {Annals of Translational Medicine},
	volume = {5},
	number = {20},
	year = {2017},
	keywords = {},
	abstract = {Academic journals that undergo a process of academic scrutiny often pass a stage of peer review and subsequent editorial approval. In a process that can take weeks or months (in some cases, even years), an author aims to satisfy the requirements of peer reviewer and editorial scrutiny that would merit publication of their work. It is customary to, in traditional, non-open access journals, to then sign over copyright to the publisher, upon which the publisher then issues a proof, and the manuscript is then published. Even though it is obvious that an author would not submit to a journal with the objective of having it rejected, the issue of the timing of copyright transfer is one which does not appear to have been discussed in the literature, possibly because the order of transfer, i.e., after acceptance of a paper for publication, seems naturally logical. With the modernization of online submission systems, the transfer of copyright tends to occur online, after acceptance. However, on occasion, some journals request the transfer of copyright before peer review and editorial processing occurs, i.e., upon the act of submission. This letter examines three cases of Springer Nature plant science journals that demand the transfer of copyright to the journal’s society upon submission, in direct violation of their instructions for authors. Authors have no right to challenge this discrepancy, nor can they complete submission in accordance with the instructions for authors because they are forced to submit copyright upon submission. Not only does transfer of copyright at such an early stage of the publishing process constitute a waste of authors’ time—a precious commodity in a cut-throat field of science—in the three cases indicated in this paper, they may constitute a violation of authors’ rights. The ethics of this request by the journals and publisher need to be debated.},
	issn = {2305-5847},	url = {https://atm.amegroups.org/article/view/16103}
}