The interplay between the nerves and skeleton: a 30-year bibliometric analysis
Original Article

The interplay between the nerves and skeleton: a 30-year bibliometric analysis

Hongxiang Mei1, Yumeng Wu1, Qingchen Feng1, Xingjian Li1, Jiawei Zhou1, Fulin Jiang1, Shishu Huang2, Juan Li1

1State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Center of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: J Li, S Huang; (II) Administrative support: Y Wu, Q Feng; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: H Mei; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: H Mei; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: H Mei, Y Wu, Q Feng, X Li, J Zhou, F Jiang; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Correspondence to: Juan Li. Department of Orthodontics, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Center of Stomatology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, No. 14, 3rd Section, South Renmin Road, Chengdu 610041, China. Email: lijuan@scu.edu.cn.

Background: The mechanisms and effects of the interplay between the nerves and skeleton remain a popular research topic. This study aimed to analyze and evaluate publications on nerve-bone interactions using bibliometrics and to identify the state of the art of current research, hotspots, and future directions.

Methods: This study included 1989 articles and reviews from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) published from January 1, 1991, to June 22, 2022. The Bibliometrix package of R 4.2.0 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used to analyze basic information about the publications, including the annual number of publications, institution analysis, author influence analysis, journal analysis, and the national cooperation network. We also used CiteSpace 5.8.R3 for bibliometric analysis, including co-occurrence, co-citation, and cluster analysis.

Results: We discovered a significant increase in the number of articles on nerve-bone interactions published over the last 10 years. The most active country and institution were the United States and the University of Minnesota, respectively. In terms of journals and cocited journals, Bone was ranked highest with respect to the number of publications, while Journal of Bone and Mineral Research was ranked highest among cited journals. Wang Lei was the author with the most publications, and Bjurholm A was the most cited author. The analysis of references and keywords revealed that the impact of nerve- and neuromodulation-related factors on stem cell differentiation was a persistently hot topic. Osteoarthritis, neuropeptide Y, and osteoclastogenic process are likely to be the next era of research hotspots. The neurovascular crosstalk within bone has received great attention, especially in skeletal diseases, which may provide potential targets for future treatments.

Conclusions: We used a bibliometric method to provide an efficient, objective, and comprehensive assessment of existing research about the interplay between the skeletal and nervous systems and to accurately identify hotspots and research frontiers, providing valuable information for future research.

Keywords: Skeleton; bibliometric analysis; nerve; Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC); knowledge map


Submitted Jun 28, 2022. Accepted for publication Oct 18, 2022. Published online Jan 12 2023.

doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3323


Highlight box

Key findings

• This paper summarizes the research thread and research frontier in the field of nerve-skeleton interaction using bibliometrics method.

What is known and what is new?

• We concluded that the most active country and institution were the United States and the University of Minnesota, respectively. In terms of journals and cocited journals, Bone was ranked highest with respect to the number of publications, while Journal of Bone and Mineral Research was ranked highest among cited journals. Wang Lei was the author with the most publications, and Bjurholm A was the most cited author.

• We conclude that the current research frontier will focus on osteoarthritis, neuropeptide Y, and osteoclastogenic process.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

• The research in the field of nerve-skeleton interaction should pay more attention to sympathetic nerve, osteoarthritis, osteoclastogenic process, and the crosstalk among nerves, bones and blood vessels.


Introduction

The interplay of the skeletal and nervous systems is considered an important regulatory mechanism for bone development, turnover, and regeneration (1). Nerve fibers are the first to be detected in the bone microenvironment during skeletal development, particularly in ossification centers (2). Cells adjacent to centers of incipient ossification can secrete nerve growth factor (NGF), increase innervation of bone surfaces, promote vascular invasion of the primary and secondary ossification centers, and increase femoral length and volume (3). Furthermore, in skeletal pathophysiologies, such as fractures, bone cancer, heterotopic ossification, bone defects, or osteoporosis, dysregulation of bone homeostasis is often accompanied by significant alterations in the density and distribution of nerve fibers (4,5). The consistency of the distribution of nerves with the area of ossification centers during bone regeneration suggests a nerve-guided self-healing process in skeletal diseases, including for bone defects (6-8). In addition, soft tissue trauma induces perivascular NGF expression, which mediates nerve axonal invasion and subsequently triggers heterotopic ossification within the soft tissue (9). Thus, nerves regulate bone homeostasis both in developmental and pathological states.

Bibliometrics, a quantitative and qualitative analysis method for published academic literature, is commonly used to track the development of a given research field within a defined time frame, which is important for evaluating scientific activities in the field (10). Through focusing on the impact of publications, contributions of individuals/institutions/countries, patterns of authorship, and future research direction, bibliometrics reflects the current status and research trends in a scientific and comprehensive manner. CiteSpace, a valuable Java-based application for bibliometrics, developed by Prof. Chaomei Chen, is widely used to analyze and visualize the author/institution/country collaboration, author/literature cocitation relationship, and keyword co-occurrence relationship of academic literature (11). This approach has been applied in various disciplines, such as oncology, hypertension, and periodontology (12-14). However, to date, no bibliometric analyses of the global literature on interactions between the skeletal and nervous systems have been conducted.

Based on the complexity and importance of nerve-skeleton interactions, a bibliometric analysis can show the lineage and trends of the field, which would provide a reference for further research. Bibliometric analysis can provide information about the main contributing journals, seminal articles, active institutions and research teams, and recent hotpots in the field of nerve-skeleton interaction. This paper provides a bibliometric analysis for research on the interplay between the nerves and skeleton from 1991 to 2022. We aim to provide a panoramic picture of the current research and predict future research hotspots.


Methods

Data acquisition and search strategy

All data were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on June 22, 2022. The search strategy used for this study was as follows: “(TS = (Osteoblasts OR Osteocytes OR Osteoclasts OR Osteogenesis OR Osteolysis OR Biomineralization)) AND TS = (innervation OR neurons OR nerve)” (TS = Topics). The timespan was from January 1, 1991, to June 22, 2022, which yielded a total of 2,127 papers. The overall workflow is shown in Figure 1. All data were independently searched by the 2 authors and stored in text format. Publications with little value, such as conference papers and letters, were filtered out. Only 1,989 articles and reviews were used for subsequent analysis. The data were downloaded from public databases, and no medical ethics issues were involved.

Figure 1 Workflow of this study. TS, topics.

Data analysis

The Bibliometrix package of R 4.2.0 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used to extract and analyze the basic information about the publications, including the annual number of publications, institution analysis, author analysis (including H index, G index, M index, and publication overtime), journal analysis, and the national cooperation network. The H index refers to authors who have published at least H papers, with each paper being cited at least H times (6). Given a set of articles ranked in decreasing order of the number of citations they have received, the G index is the largest number such that the top G article has received at least G2 citations (15). The M index refers to the author’s H index divided by the author’s academic age (academic age was measured as the number of years since the first published paper in the research area) (6). The H index, G index, and M index were used to characterize the output of each researcher.

To further show the relationship between the publications mentioned above, we used CiteSpace 5.8.R3 for bibliometric analysis. CiteSpace is a Java-based citation visualization tool developed by Professor Chaomei Chen that can show the structure, patterns, and distribution of scientific knowledge (16,17). CiteSpace has 5 main functions:

  • Co-occurrence analysis (including authors, institutions, countries, and keywords), which showed the cooperation and clustering relationships of individual nodes.
  • Cocitation analysis (including references and cited authors), which showed the relevance and clustering relationship of each node, with document cocitation referring to the relationship between paper A and paper B when paper A and paper B are both cocited by paper C (18,19).
  • Cluster identification, in which the cluster labels were based on the “title term” of each article.
  • Timeline construction, in which the specific publications/keywords in each cluster were arranged by publication time, showing the time period and relationship of the publications of each cluster.
  • Parameter identification, in which burst, centrality, and sigma were analyzed for each node (including references, authors, and institutions), with burst indicating the sudden change of the node in the whole network, centrality indicating the importance of the node in the whole cocitation or cooccurrence network, and sigma indicating the combination of burst and centrality.

Statistical analysis

This study is a descriptive study using numbers, frequencies, and percentages to describe the indicators statistically. There was no difference analysis involved, and there was no need to set a test level. R 4.2.0 and CiteSpace 5.8.R3 were used to extract indicators and generate graphs.


Results

General characteristics of publications

The annual distribution of 1,989 publications (only articles and reviews) is shown in Figure 2A. The year 2009 was a very clear cutoff point in terms of annual publications. From 1991 to 2008, this field underwent a development period, with a total of 620 publications over 17 years. From 2009 to 2022, there was a qualitative leap, with 1,369 articles published during the 14 years, nearly twice the number as that of the previous period. These findings indicated that the interplay between nerves and the skeleton had become a popular research topic.

Figure 2 Time, subject category, institution, and country distribution of publications. (A) Annual publications and accumulated publications from 1991 to 2022. (B) Subject categories distribution and co-occurrence analysis. (C) Geographic distribution of countries on nerve-bone interactions publications between 1991 and 2022. The shade of the color represents the number of publications issued by the country, and the thickness of the red line represents the frequency and intensity of cooperation between countries. (D) Country distribution and co-occurrence analysis. (E) Burst analysis for countries. (F) The top 20 institutions related to publications on nerve-bone interactions from 1991 to 2022. The frequencies are listed after the names of the institutions. (G) Institution distribution and co-occurrence analysis. For (B,C,G), each node represents a category/country/institution, and the size of the ring denotes the number of publications in the category/country/institution in a given year. The color of the connecting line represents the co-occurrence time, and the shade represents the strength of the association. The CiteSpace parameters were as follows: link retaining factor (LRF =3), look back years (LBY =8), e for top n (e=2; n=50), timespan [1991–2022], and years per slice [1].

Subject category analysis

A category co-occurrence analysis revealed that publications mainly focused on “cell biology” [393], followed by “biochemistry & molecular biology” [230], “surgery” [223], “neurosciences & neurology” [205], “endocrinology & metabolism” [198], “research & experimental medicine“ [161], “medicine, research & experimental” [161], and “dentistry, oral surgery & medicine” [159] (Figure 2B). These categories indicated that research about the interplay of skeletal and nervous systems was multifaceted and multilayered, including cellular physiological and biochemical research, as well as clinical application research, such as for drugs and clinical treatments. Notably, dentistry-related research played an integral role in the field.

Country analysis

Research on nerve-bone interactions was conducted in 72 countries. Among the top 10 countries, there were 2 North American countries, 3 Asian countries, 4 European countries, and 1 Oceanian county (Australia) (Figure 2C; Table S1). With 1,552 papers, the United States published most of the publications, followed by China [1,237] and Japan [602]. These 3 countries were also the global centers of cooperation (Figure 2D), leading the research on nerve-bone interplay. Notably, the burst analysis showed a spike in post-2018 publications in China (Figure 2E).

Institution analysis

All publications were from 2043 institutions, indicating a broad interest in crosstalk between nerves and the skeleton. Among the top 20 institutions, 9 were from the United States, 7 were from China, 3 were from Japan, and 1 was from Portugal (Figure 2F; Table S2). The University of Minnesota was the most active institution (Figure 2F). Institution cooperation analysis showed that the Fourth Military Medical University (frequency =31), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (frequency =28), and Sichuan University (frequency =24) were collaborating extensively with other institutions. Articles from these institutions were mainly published after 2008, showing when Chinese institutions emerged in this field (Figure 2G).

Author analysis

A total of 8,598 authors published articles about the interplay between nerves and the skeleton. The academic output of these authors was assessed based on the H index, and the top 20 authors are shown in Figure 3A. Analysis of the H index showed the 5 most important authors were Elefteriou F, Mantyh PW, Wang L, Togari A, and Karsenty G. Additional information for the top 20 authors, including the G index and M index, is listed in Table S3.

Figure 3 Author analysis. (A) The top 20 authors according to the H index. The H index is defined as authors who have published at least H papers, with each paper been cited at least H times. (B) The top 20 authors’ production over time. The size of the node represents the number of articles published, and the shade of the color represents the total number of citations (TC). (C) Author co-occurrence network. (D) Author cocitation network. For (C,D), each node represents an author/cited author, and the size of the ring denotes the number of publications of the author/cited author in a given year. The color of the connecting line represents the co-occurrence/cocitation time, and the shade represents the strength of the association. The CiteSpace parameters were as follows: link retaining factor (LRF =3), look back years (LBY =8), e for top n (e=2; n=50), timespan [1991–2022], and years per slice [1].

Author cooperation analysis showed that cooperation across the field was not very close. The research team centered on Mantyh PW published more in the early years, mostly around the year 2000. The Wang Lei-centered team was more active around the year 2012. The Cao Xu-centered team was more active around the year 2019 (Figure 3B,3C and Table S4). Wang Lei was the most active researcher (Figure 3C), whose research focused on the mechanisms and clinical applications of peripheral nerves in the field of bone defects, especially the role of the inferior alveolar nerve and nerve-related factors in distraction osteogenesis (20-24). The top 20 authors in terms of author cooperation are listed in Table S4.

The author cocitation analysis showed that Bjurholm A was the most cited author with 143 citations, followed by Elefteriou F [132], Pittenger MF [127], and Takeda S [124] (Figure 3D; Table S5).

Journal analysis

In order to obtain a picture of the journals publishing literature about the interplay of the skeletal and nervous systems, we analyzed the publication volume of journals. The top 10 journals in terms of publication volume are shown in Figure 4A, with the top 3 being Bone (IF =4.398), PLoS ONE (IF =3.240), and Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (IF =6.471). These journals were excellent choices for researchers to submit their manuscripts.

Figure 4 Journal analysis. (A) The top 10 journals by publication volume. (B) The top 10 journals by citation number. (C) The journal cocitation network. Each node represents a journal, and the size of the ring denotes the number of publications of the journal in a given year. The color of the connecting line represents the cocitation time, and the shade represents the strength of the association. The CiteSpace parameters were as follows: link retaining factor (LRF =3), look back years (LBY =8), e for top n (e=2; n=50), timespan [1991–2022], and years per slice [1].

As the impact of journals was measured by the number of citations, we listed the top 10 journals with the highest number of citations (Figure 4B). Furthermore, we conducted a journal cocitation analysis (Figure 4C) and identified the top 20 journals based on citation frequency (Table S6). Seven journals were identified as seminal journals with high-quality articles, which included Journal of Biological Chemistry (IF =5.157), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (IF =11.205), Nature (IF =49.962), Science (IF =48.728), Cell (IF =41.582), The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (IF =6.741), and Bone (IF =4.398). If readers need to gain a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the field, they should primarily target articles from these journals.

Reference analysis

We performed a 30-year reference cocitation analysis of these publications. We found that the article entitled “Leptin regulates bone formation via the sympathetic nervous system” in Cell by Takeda et al. (25) was the most frequently cited article, followed by the articles entitled “Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells” (26), “Sema3A regulates bone-mass accrual through sensory innervations” (27), and “Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART” (28) (Figure S1). Furthermore, we conducted a 10-year reference cocitation analysis. The article entitled “Sema3A regulates bone-mass accrual through sensory innervations” (27) was found to be the most frequently cited piece of literature in the last 10 years, followed by the articles entitled “The role of peripheral nerve fibers and their neurotransmitters in cartilage and bone physiology and pathophysiology” (29) and “Implant-derived magnesium induces local neuronal production of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) to improve bone-fracture healing in rats” (30) (Figure 5A). Cluster analysis of publications revealed that osteoarthritis pain, neurovascular unit response, and neuropeptide Y (NPY) subject clusters had been the research hotspots since 2015 (Figure 5B,5C). In addition, the mesenchymal stem cell, mesenchymal stromal cell population, multipotent differentiation, and adipose-derived stem cell subject clusters indicated that stem cell research remained an important part of the field (Figure 5C). The article entitled “Implant-derived magnesium induces local neuronal production of CGRP to improve bone-fracture healing in rats” (30) was the most emergent article (burstness strength =9.11), followed by the articles entitled “Subchondral bone osteoclasts induce sensory innervation and osteoarthritis pain” (31) (burstness strength =8.65) and “Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART” (28) (burstness strength =7.35; Figure 5D).

Figure 5 The 10-year reference analysis. (A) A 10-year reference cocitation analysis. Each node represents a reference, and the size of the ring denotes citations of the reference. The color of the connecting line represents the cocitation time, and the shade represents the strength of the association. (B) Cluster analysis for 10 years of references. Different color blocks represent different clusters. The color of the block represents the publication time period of references in the cluster, and the labels are marked to reflect the topic of the respective cluster. (C) Time distribution of articles in different clusters. (D) The top 25 references with the strongest citation bursts. The CiteSpace parameters were as follows: link retaining factor (LRF =3), look back years (LBY =8), e for top n (e=2; n=50), timespan [2011–2022], and years per slice [1].

Research hotpots and frontier

We further conducted a 10-year keyword co-occurrence analysis for publications from 2011 to 2022 and found that “expression”, “differentiation”, “cell”, and “mesenchymal stem cell” were the most frequent keywords (Figure 6A). These top keywords were consistent with the results of the 30-year keyword co-occurrence analysis (Figure S2A). We further conducted a cluster analysis of 10-year keywords and found that there were 13 clusters, including bone cancer pain, osteoclastogenic factor, mesenchymal stem cell, bone loss, bone microenvironment, and mandibular distraction osteogenesis clusters (Figure 6B,6C). The 30-year keywords cluster analysis provided more information for hotpots from 1991 to 2022 (Figure S2B,S2C).

Figure 6 The 10-year keywords analysis. (A) The 10-year keyword co-occurrence analysis. Each node represents a keyword, and the size of the ring denotes the frequency of the keyword. The color of the connecting line represents the co-occurrence time, and the shade represents the strength of the association. (B) Cluster analysis for 10 years of keywords. Different color blocks represent different clusters. The labels are marked to reflect the topic of the respective cluster. (C) Time distribution of keywords in different clusters. (D) The top 25 keywords with the strongest occurrence burst. The CiteSpace parameters were as follows: link retaining factor (LRF =3), look back years (LBY =8), e for top n (e=2; n=50), timespan [2011–2022], and years per slice [1].

We also performed a 10-year keyword burst analysis. The burst strength of “reconstruction” was found to be the highest, followed by “bone regeneration” and “stem cell” (Figure 6D). The subjects of neuropeptides and substance P were hot topics from 2020 to 2022. The 30-year keywords burst analysis suggested that the top 3 keywords in terms of burst strength were “immunoreactive nerve”, “messenger RNA” and “osteogenic differentiation” (burst strength =15.25, 12.33, and 10.15, respectively). Osteogenic differentiation, scaffold, bone regeneration, and fracture remained the burst topics from 2010 to now (Figure S2D).


Discussion

We analyzed the highly cited articles reporting on the interplay of the skeletal and nervous systems based on 30-year and 10-year reference cocitation analysis. This analysis provided a comprehensive picture of the development of research examining crosstalk between the nerves and skeleton across a 30-year timeframe. Before 1999, highly cited articles focused on the distribution of nerves within the bone (32). After 2000, research fell into 2 main directions. On the one hand, publications in Nature in 2005 (28), Journal of Clinical Investigation in 2002 (33), and Cell in 2000 (34) and 2002 (25) all focused on leptin, an important hormone that activates the sympathetic release of neuropeptides to participate in bone remodeling, inhibiting osteogenesis and promoting osteoclastic process. These articles became the seminal literature on the neural regulation of bone homeostasis. Meanwhile, around the year 2000, a series of articles discovered that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could differentiate into ectodermal neuronal cells (26,35,36). This groundbreaking discovery provided the theoretical basis for subsequent tissue engineering and neuroscience research. Later, highly cited publications from 2011 to 2022 focused on sensory nerves after Fukuda et al. (27) identified that sensory innervation can regulate bone mass. This discovery allowed for the understanding that two clinical symptoms—pain and bone remodeling—are mechanistically coupled in skeletal disorders. Some osteoarthritis research focused on osteoclasts, which can secrete factors to induce sensory nerve axonal growth and cause osteoarthritis pain (31,37). This confirmed that bone tissue could lead to a different effect on the germination and atrophy of sensory nerves in the pathological state, a discovery which expands the understanding of the interplay between nerves and the skeleton (38).

Using cluster analysis and burst analysis, we identified 4 molecules as “star molecules” during the interplay between the skeletal and nervous systems; these were CGRP, NPY, semaphorin 3A (Sema3A), and NGF. CGRP has been a key topic in this field since 1991 (39) and has been proven to be involved in bone formation and skeletal diseases (40). Since the year 2000, CGRP has gradually become a marker of sensory nerves or an indicator of sensory nerve activity. NPY is an extremely important neurological factor in the sympathetic nervous system, which started to be a hot topic in 2012. The role of NPY in bone metabolism is multifaceted (41). On the one hand, NPY can lead to a decrease in bone mass by combining with Y1 receptors (42,43). On the other hand, NPY exhibits an osteoprotective effect by directly promoting the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs (44-47) and combining Y1 receptors in macrophages to maintain the activity of stem cells (18). Sema3A is an axon repellant about which an explosion of studies emerged beginning in 2012 (48). Sensory nerve-derived Sema3A functions as an osteoprotective factor and plays an important role in bone development and remodeling (27). An explosion of articles related to NGF began to appear after 2017. NGF secreted by osteoblasts, stem cells, and macrophages can combine with the tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA) receptor on sensory nerves to guide sensory nerve growth, promoting angiogenesis and bone tissue formation. NGF plays an indispensable role in bone formation (3), osteoarthritis (49,50), bone fracture (8), mechanical loading (51), bone defects (7), and rare bone disease (including heterotopic ossification) (9). These star molecules are currently hot topics in the study of nerve-bone interaction due to their extremely important roles.

Our results also show the current research hotspots and frontiers. Among clinical disorders, osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent and debilitating joint disorder without effective medical therapy because of a limited understanding of its pathogenesis (27,47). The clinical issue of osteoarthritis pain has received widespread attention (49,52,53). Among clinical symptoms, sympathetic and sensory nerves play an important role in nerve-bone interactions (53). Among bone remodeling, the osteoclastic process has gained increasing attention from researchers. Osteoclasts can secrete various factors involved in bone remodeling and affect the growth of nerve axons, leading to nociceptive hypersensitivity in osteoarthritis (31,54,55). Among cells in bone, osteocytes have received increasing attention (56). Several studies have confirmed that osteocytes can also secrete neuromodulation-related factors such as NPY and Sema3A to participate in bone remodeling (57,58), which may be regulated by nerves (57).

The cluster analysis of publications revealed that “neurovascular unit response” has been a popular research topic since 2015, which suggests that a deeper examination of the crosstalk between nerves and blood vessels during skeletal development and pathophysiology is needed. In skeletal development, sensory nerves are first distributed around capillaries surrounding bone trabeculae, especially in areas with high osteogenic and chondrogenic activity (2). In turn, innervation induces vascular invasion of primary and secondary ossification centers in the skeleton, which ultimately mediates bone growth (59). Notably, although the phenomenon of neurovascular crosstalk in skeletal development has been extensively studied, the functional coupling of nerves, vessels, and skeleton in skeletal pathophysiology can provide more information for the treatment of related diseases. Some bone-related rare diseases, such as fibrodysplasia ossificans and heterotopic ossification, have become typical models for bone homeostasis imbalance (60). Heterotopic ossification is caused by severe soft tissue trauma and characterized by extraskeletal pathological cartilage and bone formation (61,62). Several clinical symptoms, including pain and a high prevalence around large peripheral nerves, suggest the important role of nerves in the initiation and development of heterotopic ossification (63). A further study confirmed that vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes could secrete NGF to mediate axon innervation (9). Nerve injury, in turn, affects the formation of blood vessels, thereby delaying ossification (64). The same nerve-vessel crosstalk was found in osteoarthritis, another skeletal disease characterized by pain. In the early stage of osteoarthritis, increased osteoclast activity in the subchondral bone leads to the release of transforming growth factor- β1 (TGF-β1) to precipitate angiogenesis and the secretion of netrin-1 to induce innervation (31). The nerves grow into the cartilage along the blood vessels, triggering osteoarthritis pain. During the late stage of osteoarthritis, NGF secretion by preosteoclasts and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) secretion by osteoblasts mediate persistent nerve germination (49,65). The neurovascular crosstalk within bone has received great attention, especially in skeletal diseases, which may provide potential targets for future treatments.


Conclusions

This article surveyed the global scientific output of research into the interplay between the skeletal and nervous systems from January 1, 1991, to June 22, 2022. We found a significant increase in the number of articles published over the last 10 years. In terms of countries, the United States, China, and Japan were leading research centers and dominated global research collaborations. In terms of institutions, the University of Minnesota was the leader in the field. In terms of authors, Wang Lei was the most active researcher, while Bjurholm A produced the most prolific and widely cited outputs. In terms of journals, Bone and Journal of Bone and Mineral Research were the most prominent sources for research on nerve-bone interactions. The impact of nerve- and neuromodulation-related factors on stem cell differentiation was a persistently hot topic. Osteoarthritis, neuropeptide, and osteoclastogenic processes will likely emerge as hotspots in the next era of research.


Acknowledgments

Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31971240 and 31670951) and the Clinical Research Project of West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University (No. LCYJ2019-22).


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-3323/coif). All authors report that this work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31971240 and 31670951) and the Clinical Research Project of West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University (No. LCYJ2019-22). The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Brazill JM, Beeve AT, Craft CS, et al. Nerves in Bone: Evolving Concepts in Pain and Anabolism. J Bone Miner Res 2019;34:1393-406. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Sisask G, Silfverswärd CJ, Bjurholm A, et al. Ontogeny of sensory and autonomic nerves in the developing mouse skeleton. Auton Neurosci 2013;177:237-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Tomlinson RE, Li Z, Zhang Q, et al. NGF-TrkA Signaling by Sensory Nerves Coordinates the Vascularization and Ossification of Developing Endochondral Bone. Cell Rep 2016;16:2723-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Chartier SR, Thompson ML, Longo G, et al. Exuberant sprouting of sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers in nonhealed bone fractures and the generation and maintenance of chronic skeletal pain. Pain 2014;155:2323-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Li J, Kreicbergs A, Bergström J, et al. Site-specific CGRP innervation coincides with bone formation during fracture healing and modeling: A study in rat angulated tibia. J Orthop Res 2007;25:1204-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:16569-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Meyers CA, Lee S, Sono T, et al. A Neurotrophic Mechanism Directs Sensory Nerve Transit in Cranial Bone. Cell Rep 2020;31:107696. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Li Z, Meyers CA, Chang L, et al. Fracture repair requires TrkA signaling by skeletal sensory nerves. J Clin Invest 2019;129:5137-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Lee S, Hwang C, Marini S, et al. NGF-TrkA signaling dictates neural ingrowth and aberrant osteochondral differentiation after soft tissue trauma. Nat Commun 2021;12:4939. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Nicolaisen J. Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2010;61:205-7. [Crossref]
  11. Chen C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2006;57:359-77. [Crossref]
  12. Ahmad P, Slots J. A bibliometric analysis of periodontology. Periodontol 2000 2021;85:237-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Devos P, Ménard J. Trends in Worldwide Research in Hypertension Over the Period 1999-2018: A Bibliometric Study. Hypertension 2020;76:1649-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Ding H, Wu C, Liao N, et al. Radiomics in Oncology: A 10-Year Bibliometric Analysis. Front Oncol 2021;11:689802. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 2006;69:131-52. [Crossref]
  16. Chen C. Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:5303-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Chen C, Song M. Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PLoS One 2019;14:e0223994. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Park MH, Jin HK, Min WK, et al. Neuropeptide Y regulates the hematopoietic stem cell microenvironment and prevents nerve injury in the bone marrow. EMBO J 2015;34:1648-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Marshakova IV. System of document connections based on references. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya Seriya 2-Informatsionnye Protsessy I Sistemy 1973;2:3-8.
  20. Wang XD, Li SY, Zhang SJ, et al. The neural system regulates bone homeostasis via mesenchymal stem cells: a translational approach. Theranostics 2020;10:4839-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Wang L, Wei JH, Yang X, et al. Preventing Early-Stage Graft Bone Resorption by Simultaneous Innervation: Innervated Iliac Bone Flap for Mandibular Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:1152e-61e. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Zhao YH, Zhang SJ, Yang ZH, et al. Relationship of distraction rate with inferior alveolar nerve degeneration-regeneration shift. Neural Regen Res 2018;13:360-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Wang L, Zhao Y, Cao J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells modified with nerve growth factor improve recovery of the inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;53:279-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Cao J, Zhang S, Gupta A, et al. Sensory Nerves Affect Bone Regeneration in Rabbit Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis. Int J Med Sci 2019;16:831-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Takeda S, Elefteriou F, Levasseur R, et al. Leptin regulates bone formation via the sympathetic nervous system. Cell 2002;111:305-17. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999;284:143-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  27. Fukuda T, Takeda S, Xu R, et al. Sema3A regulates bone-mass accrual through sensory innervations. Nature 2013;497:490-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  28. Elefteriou F, Ahn JD, Takeda S, et al. Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART. Nature 2005;434:514-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  29. Grässel SG. The role of peripheral nerve fibers and their neurotransmitters in cartilage and bone physiology and pathophysiology. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16:485. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  30. Zhang Y, Xu J, Ruan YC, et al. Implant-derived magnesium induces local neuronal production of CGRP to improve bone-fracture healing in rats. Nat Med 2016;22:1160-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  31. Zhu S, Zhu J, Zhen G, et al. Subchondral bone osteoclasts induce sensory innervation and osteoarthritis pain. J Clin Invest 2019;129:1076-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  32. Serre CM, Farlay D, Delmas PD, et al. Evidence for a dense and intimate innervation of the bone tissue, including glutamate-containing fibers. Bone 1999;25:623-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  33. Baldock PA, Sainsbury A, Couzens M, et al. Hypothalamic Y2 receptors regulate bone formation. J Clin Invest 2002;109:915-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  34. Ducy P, Amling M, Takeda S, et al. Leptin inhibits bone formation through a hypothalamic relay: a central control of bone mass. Cell 2000;100:197-207. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  35. Woodbury D, Schwarz EJ, Prockop DJ, et al. Adult rat and human bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neurons. J Neurosci Res 2000;61:364-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  36. Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature 2002;418:41-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  37. Walsh DA, McWilliams DF, Turley MJ, et al. Angiogenesis and nerve growth factor at the osteochondral junction in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:1852-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  38. Mapp PI, Walsh DA. Mechanisms and targets of angiogenesis and nerve growth in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2012;8:390-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  39. Hill EL, Elde R. Distribution of CGRP-, VIP-, D beta H-, SP-, and NPY-immunoreactive nerves in the periosteum of the rat. Cell Tissue Res 1991;264:469-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  40. Imai S, Rauvala H, Konttinen YT, et al. Efferent targets of osseous CGRP-immunoreactive nerve fiber before and after bone destruction in adjuvant arthritic rat: an ultramorphological study on their terminal-target relations. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:1018-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  41. Wee NKY, Sinder BP, Novak S, et al. Skeletal phenotype of the neuropeptide Y knockout mouse. Neuropeptides 2019;73:78-88. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  42. Sousa DM, Baldock PA, Enriquez RF, et al. Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor antagonism increases bone mass in mice. Bone 2012;51:8-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  43. Lv X, Gao F, Li TP, et al. Skeleton interoception regulates bone and fat metabolism through hypothalamic neuroendocrine NPY. Elife 2021;10:e70324. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  44. Liu S, Jin D, Wu JQ, et al. Neuropeptide Y stimulates osteoblastic differentiation and VEGF expression of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells related to canonical Wnt signaling activating in vitro. Neuropeptides 2016;56:105-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  45. Park MH, Lee JK, Kim N, et al. Neuropeptide Y Induces Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cell Mobilization by Regulating Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Activity Through Y1 Receptor in Osteoblasts. Stem Cells 2016;34:2145-56. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  46. Wu J, Liu S, Meng H, et al. Neuropeptide Y enhances proliferation and prevents apoptosis in rat bone marrow stromal cells in association with activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in vitro. Stem Cell Res 2017;21:74-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  47. He J, Meng G, Yao R, et al. The essential role of inorganic substrate in the migration and osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;59:353-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  48. Hayashi M, Nakashima T, Taniguchi M, et al. Osteoprotection by semaphorin 3A. Nature 2012;485:69-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  49. Aso K, Shahtaheri SM, Hill R, et al. Associations of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis With Histopathologic Features in Subchondral Bone. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:916-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  50. LaBranche TP, Bendele AM, Omura BC, et al. Nerve growth factor inhibition with tanezumab influences weight-bearing and subsequent cartilage damage in the rat medial meniscal tear model. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:295-302. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  51. Tomlinson RE, Li Z, Li Z, et al. NGF-TrkA signaling in sensory nerves is required for skeletal adaptation to mechanical loads in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114:E3632-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  52. Jin Y, Liu Q, Chen P, et al. A novel prostaglandin E receptor 4 (EP4) small molecule antagonist induces articular cartilage regeneration. Cell Discov 2022;8:24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  53. Sun Q, Zhen G, Li TP, et al. Parathyroid hormone attenuates osteoarthritis pain by remodeling subchondral bone in mice. Elife 2021;10:e66532. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  54. Saad S, Dharmapatni AASSK, Crotti TN, et al. Semaphorin-3a, neuropilin-1 and plexin-A1 in prosthetic-particle induced bone loss. Acta Biomater 2016;30:311-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  55. Jiang W, Jin Y, Zhang S, et al. PGE2 activates EP4 in subchondral bone osteoclasts to regulate osteoarthritis. Bone Res 2022;10:27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  56. Nakashima T, Hayashi M, Fukunaga T, et al. Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat Med 2011;17:1231-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  57. Zhang Y, Chen CY, Liu YW, et al. Neuronal Induction of Bone-Fat Imbalance through Osteocyte Neuropeptide Y. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2021;8:e2100808. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  58. Hayashi M, Nakashima T, Yoshimura N, et al. Autoregulation of Osteocyte Sema3A Orchestrates Estrogen Action and Counteracts Bone Aging. Cell Metab 2019;29:627-637.e5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  59. Tomlinson RE, Christiansen BA, Giannone AA, et al. The Role of Nerves in Skeletal Development, Adaptation, and Aging. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11:646. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  60. Wan QQ, Qin WP, Ma YX, et al. Crosstalk between Bone and Nerves within Bone. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2021;8:2003390. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  61. Wong KR, Mychasiuk R, O'Brien TJ, et al. Neurological heterotopic ossification: novel mechanisms, prognostic biomarkers and prophylactic therapies. Bone Res 2020;8:42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  62. Teasell RW, Mehta S, Aubut JL, et al. A systematic review of the therapeutic interventions for heterotopic ossification after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2010;48:512-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  63. Salga M, Jourdan C, Durand MC, et al. Sciatic nerve compression by neurogenic heterotopic ossification: use of CT to determine surgical indications. Skeletal Radiol 2015;44:233-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  64. Qin Q, Gomez-Salazar M, Cherief M, et al. Neuron-to-vessel signaling is a required feature of aberrant stem cell commitment after soft tissue trauma. Bone Res 2022;10:43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  65. Zhu J, Zhen G, An S, et al. Aberrant subchondral osteoblastic metabolism modifies Na(V)1.8 for osteoarthritis. Elife 2020;9:e57656. [Crossref] [PubMed]

(English Language Editors: C. Mullens and J. Gray)

Cite this article as: Mei H, Wu Y, Feng Q, Li X, Zhou J, Jiang F, Huang S, Li J. The interplay between the nerves and skeleton: a 30-year bibliometric analysis. Ann Transl Med 2023;11(1):9. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3323

Download Citation