Correlations between microRNAs and their target genes in skeletal myoblasts cell therapy for myocardial infarction

In the setting of ischemic heart disease in which revascularization therapies (both percutaneous and surgery) and pharmaceutical therapy are able to contribute to ventricular remodeling, nowadays we also have some indications about promising options to prevent or reverse the ventricular remodelling process and consequent heart failure. Stem cells provide an alternative curative intervention for the infarcted heart by compensating for the cardiomyocyte loss subsequent to myocardial injury. The presence of resident stem and progenitor cell populations in the heart, and nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells with genetic induction of pluripotency markers are the emerging new developments in stem cell-based regenerative medicine. However, until safety and feasibility of these cells are established by extensive experimentation in in vitro and in vivo experimental models, skeletal muscle-derived myoblasts, and bone marrow cells remain the most well-studied donor cell types for myocardial regeneration and repair (1,2). Furthermore in the literature we can find a lot of indications about microRNAs as novel and alternative cardiac biomarkers. These are 22-nucleotide-long non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression at post-transcriptional level. Several recent studies have shown that miRNAs play a physiological role in cardiovascular homeostasis and in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Expression-pattern studies of myocardial tissue reveal that several miRNAs are up- or down-regulated during myocardial infarction (3,4). During nearly two decades of cell therapy research for treatment of ischemic heart disease, stem cell transplantation, either alone or in combination with the other therapeutic interventions, has demonstrated promise as a novel curative strategy (5). The prime advantage of the heart cell therapy using stem cells is its capability to replace the loss-of-functioning cardiomyocytes to preserve the deterioration of left ventricular function (6,7). Of all stem cells used, skeletal muscle-derived myoblasts have been investigated in experimental and clinical studies; in fact skeletal myoblasts and bone marrow derived stem cells remain the most well-characterized studied therapy for myocardial reparability in the patients with ischemic heart disease (8,9). Skeletal myoblasts constitute the renewable source of progenitor cells in skeletal muscle that participate in the repair process in the event of injury. The most important characteristics of skeletal myoblasts that make them suitable for use are their autologous availability, potential to expand in vitro, resistance to ischemia, low risk of tumorigenesis and myogenic differentiation potential (10,11). In the paper of Liu et al., published on Journal of Transplantation Medicine in 2015, the authors analyzed the correlations between microRNAs and their target genes in skeletal myoblasts cell therapy for myocardial infarction. Their final data showed that the down regulation of apoptosis-regulatory microRNAs and in turn up regulation of target genes may partially account for rescue effect of skeletal myoblasts therapy for myocardial infarction (12). Since the early 2000s we can find in the literature a lot of in vitro researches that have assessed the performance of skeletal myoblasts for the treatment of ischemic and non ischemic cardiomyopathies in animal models (13-16). All these studies showed that skeletal myoblasts prevented left ventricular remodeling, preserved ejection fraction, left ventricular pressure wall thickness and left ventricular pressure. Skeletal myoblasts were, also, used in post myocardial patients in some clinical settings (17,18). Even in these cases, results from heart function were promising increasing in left ventricular ejection fraction and in segmental contractility on echocardiography. The interesting feature of the paper of Liu et al. (12) was to compare the expression of microRNAs in post myocardial infarction rats with or without skeletal myoblasts cell transplantation. The authors focused their research on new apoptosis-associated microRNAs and their target genes; in particular they showed that four microRNAs were down regulated in the skeletal myoblasts treated group compared with the untreated group. Some studies in the recent past showed the role of microRNAs; some of this have distinct roles in modulating skeletal and cardiac muscle proliferation and differentiation (19-21); other studies have, also, demonstrated that microRNA-206 and -1 directly down regulated gap junction coupling after the initiation of myoblast fusion in vitro and in vivo and inhibit Cx 43 expression during myoblast differentiation without altering Cx43 microRNA levels (22). The paper of Liu et al., (12) is the first comparative in vitro study of microRNA and microRNA expression in myocardial infarction heart treated with skeletal myoblasts transplantation using surgical route. We hope as interesting for the future skeletal myoblasts transplantation combined with transplantation of other cell types or growth factor; a combined therapy based on simultaneous delivery of skeletal myoblasts and bone marrow stem cells may be more effective with either cell type alone as partially demonstrated in the recent past (23). In-depth mechanistic studies, genetic reprogramming or pharmacological manipulation, and combinatorial approach involving skeletal myoblast transplantation with other relevant interventions, such as growth factor administration, can help safety and therapeutic efficacy; in fact simultaneous insertion of skeletal myoblasts with multiple growth factors promoted their ability to integrate with host myocytes. Skeletal myoblasts remain the most well-studied donor cell type.

Acknowledgements

None.

Footnote

Provenance: This is a Guest Editorial commissioned by Section Editor Zhijun Han, MD (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Wuxi Second Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China).

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Comment on: Liu Q, Du GQ, Zhu ZT, et al. Identification of apoptosis-related microRNAs and their target genes in myocardial infarction post-transplantation with skeletal myoblasts. J Transl Med 2015;13:270.

References

1. Cleland JG, McGowan J. Heart failure due to ischaemic heart disease: epidemiology, pathophysiology and progression. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1999;33:S17-29. [PubMed]
2. Frangogiannis NG. The immune system and cardiac repair. Pharmacol Res 2008;58:88-111. [Crossref] [PubMed]
3. Rognoni A, Cavallino C, Lupi A, et al. Novel biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes: the role of circulating miRNAs. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2014;12:1119-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
4. Baskerville S, Bartel DP. Microarray profiling of microRNAs reveals frequent coexpression with neighboring miRNAs and host genes. RNA 2005;11:241-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
5. Leri A, Hosoda T, Rota M, et al. Myocardial Regeneration by Exogenous and Endogenous Progenitor Cells. Drug Discov Today Dis Mech 2007;4:197-203. [Crossref] [PubMed]
6. Kajstura J, Rota M, Whang B, et al. Bone marrow cells differentiate in cardiac cell lineages after infarction independently of cell fusion. Circ Res 2005;96:127-37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
7. Haider HKh, Ye L, Jiang S, et al. Angiomyogenesis for cardiac repair using human myoblasts as carriers of human vascular endothelial growth factor. J Mol Med (Berl) 2004;82:539-49. [Crossref] [PubMed]
8. Mias C, Lairez O, Trouche E, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells promote matrix metalloproteinase secretion by cardiac fibroblasts and reduce cardiac ventricular fibrosis after myocardial infarction. Stem Cells 2009;27:2734-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
9. Ince H, Petzsch M, Rehders TC, et al. Transcatheter transplantation of autologous skeletal myoblasts in postinfarction patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. J Endovasc Ther 2004;11:695-704. [Crossref] [PubMed]
10. Menasché P. Skeletal myoblasts as a therapeutic agent. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2007;50:7-17. [Crossref] [PubMed]
11. Al Attar N, Carrion C, Ghostine S, et al. Long-term (1 year) functional and histological results of autologous skeletal muscle cells transplantation in rat. Cardiovasc Res 2003;58:142-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
12. Liu Q, Du GQ, Zhu ZT, et al. Identification of apoptosis-related microRNAs and their target genes in myocardial infarction post-transplantation with skeletal myoblasts. J Transl Med 2015;13:270. [Crossref] [PubMed]
13. Al Attar N, Carrion C, Ghostine S, et al. Long-term (1 year) functional and histological results of autologous skeletal muscle cells transplantation in rat. Cardiovasc Res 2003;58:142-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
14. Taylor DA, Atkins BZ, Hungspreugs P, et al. Regenerating functional myocardium: improved performance after skeletal myoblast transplantation. Nat Med 1998;4:929-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
15. Hata H, Matsumiya G, Miyagawa S, et al. Grafted skeletal myoblast sheets attenuate myocardial remodeling in pacing-induced canine heart failure model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:918-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
16. He KL, Yi GH, Sherman W, et al. Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation improved hemodynamics and left ventricular function in chronic heart failure dogs. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1940-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
17. Menasché P, Hagège AA, Scorsin M, et al. Myoblast transplantation for heart failure. Lancet 2001;357:279-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
18. Hagège AA, Carrion C, Menasché P, et al. Viability and differentiation of autologous skeletal myoblast grafts in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Lancet 2003;361:491-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
19. Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Smythe GM, et al. Notch-mediated restoration of regenerative potential to aged muscle. Science 2003;302:1575-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
20. Chen JF, Mandel EM, Thomson JM, et al. The role of microRNA-1 and microRNA-133 in skeletal muscle proliferation and differentiation. Nat Genet 2006;38:228-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
21. Kim HK, Lee YS, Sivaprasad U, et al. Muscle-specific microRNA miR-206 promotes muscle differentiation. J Cell Biol 2006;174:677-87. [Crossref] [PubMed]
22. Anderson C, Catoe H, Werner R., et al. MIR-206 regulates connexin43 expression during skeletal muscle development. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:5863-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
23. Ye L, Haider HKh, Sim EK, et al. Adult stem cells for cardiac repair: a choice between skeletal myoblasts and bone marrow stem cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2006;231:8-19. [PubMed]