The importance of utilizing the SUPER reporting guideline for surgical technique

Surgery is a vital field of clinical treatment; however, its existence cannot subsist without the proper and effective dissemination of surgical technique. Surgical technique, which can be defined as “the specific way and skills of performing a particular medical operation” (1) is the cornerstone of a successful surgery. As Brooke once said, “Creatures of custom, that’s what we surgeons are” (2). Technique is often taught in the operating room and through videos and lectures, but the standardized reporting of surgical technique in the literature remains a critical manner in which its precise implementation and objective evaluation can occur. Various reporting guidelines have been developed over decades in efforts to improve the quality of publications (3-7), however most of them address the entire surgical process or simply name the intervention without specifically focusing on the details or the benefits and disadvantages of the technique. Zhang et al. (8) state that one reason behind this could simply be that we currently lack a guideline with sufficient information of the requirements for a detailed report that can applied to all surgical subspecialties. Therefore, they developed the Surgical techniqUe repoRting chEcklist and standaRds (SUPER) reporting guideline (8).

This checklist provides intraoperative guidelines for the surgical technique rather than focusing on perioperative care. It targets the treatment of abnormalities in people rather than focusing on the diagnosis. It is not limited to randomized controlled trials, observational studies, or case series and reports. The SUPER guideline provides 22 items that are distributed across six sections: background, rationale, and objectives (items 1 to 5); preoperative preparations and requirements (items 6 to 9); surgical technique details (items 10 to 15); postoperative considerations and tasks (items 16 to 19); summary and prospect (items 20 and 21); and other information (item 22).

The SUPER is a great tool that aids the reporting of everchanging surgical techniques that has come with the introduction of minimally invasive approaches like laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Although images and videos greatly support the reporting of these approaches, they are often lacking within the article and videos lose impact due to absence or audio or captions (9,10). Along with graphics, the SUPER can be used in a systematic manner by thoroughly fulfilling the 22 items listed to assist surgeons in their reporting of surgical technique, thereby facilitating reproducibility and most importantly benefiting patients.

Acknowledgments

Funding: None.

Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Annals of Translational Medicine. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-23-522/coif). GC serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Annals of Translational Medicine from November 2021 to October 2023. The other author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

References

1. Zhang K, Ma Y, Shi Q, et al. Developing the surgical technique reporting checklist and standards: a study protocol. Gland Surg 2021;10:2591-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
2. Brooke BN. Surgical techniques. Lancet 1971;2:1195-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
3. Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, et al. Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev 2012;1:60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
4. Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Farwana R, et al. The SCARE 2018 statement: Updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines. Int J Surg 2018;60:132-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
5. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep 2013;2013:bcr2013201554. [Crossref] [PubMed]
6. Agha R, Abdall-Razak A, Crossley E, et al. STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg 2019;72:156-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
7. Bilbro NA, Hirst A, Paez A, et al. The IDEAL Reporting Guidelines: A Delphi Consensus Statement Stage Specific Recommendations for Reporting the Evaluation of Surgical Innovation. Ann Surg 2021;273:82-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
8. Zhang K, Ma Y, Wu J, et al. The SUPER reporting guideline suggested for reporting of surgical technique. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2023; [Crossref]
9. Jacquier I, Boutron I, Moher D, et al. The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2006;244:677-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
10. Evans S, Rauh S, Jellison S, et al. Evaluation of the Completeness of Interventions Reported in Published Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Aesthet Surg J 2021;41:707-19. [Crossref] [PubMed]