New developments and updates in non-small cell lung cancer and immunotherapy: adjuvant, neoadjuvant and advanced stages
Letter to the Editor | Clinical Studies

New developments and updates in non-small cell lung cancer and immunotherapy: adjuvant, neoadjuvant and advanced stages

Alejandro Olivares-Hernández1,2#, Edel del Barco-Morillo1,2,3#, José Pablo Miramontes-González4,5

1Lung Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; 2Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; 4Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain; 5Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence to: Alejandro Olivares-Hernández, MD, PhD. Lung Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente, 182, 37007, Salamanca, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain. Email: aolivares@saludcastillayleon.es; Edel del Barco-Morillo, MD, PhD. Lung Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente, 182, 37007, Salamanca, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain. Email: ebarco@saludcastillayleon.es.

Comment on: Olivares-Hernández A, González Del Portillo E, Tamayo-Velasco Á, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: from current perspectives to future treatments-a systematic review. Ann Transl Med 2023;11:354.


Submitted Sep 12, 2023. Accepted for publication Nov 08, 2023. Published online Dec 13, 2023.

doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1854


Recently, the article entitled “Immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: from current perspectives to future treatments-a systematic review” was published (1). This systematic review gave an overview of studies investigating the use of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunotherapy is currently the mainstay of treatment of NSCLC and researchers are constantly looking into new therapies (2). In the last few months since the publication of the review, three new immune therapies have been introduced (Table 1), which are fundamental to understanding the new treatment of NSCLC, especially in the adjuvant.

Table 1

New clinical trials with immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC and their FDA approvals for the treatment of these tumours

Trial Phase Stage Histology PD-L1 Trial design Results Approved by FDA
KEYNOTE-091 3 Adjuvant IB–III All All Pembrolizumab vs. placebo post-surgery and CT DFS 58.7 vs. 34.9 m January/2023 stage IB (≥4 cm)–III All PD-L1
DFS in PD-L1 ≥50% NR vs. NR
EMPOWER-Lung 3 3 Advanced stages (1L) All All Cemiplimab + CT vs. CT OS 21.9 vs. 13.0 m November/2022 advanced or metastatic NSCLC 1L all PD-L1
PFS 8.2 vs. 5.0 m
POSEIDON 3 Advanced stages (1L) All All Durvalumab + tremelimumab +
CT vs. CT
OS 14.0 vs. 11.7 m November/2022 advanced or metastatic NSCLC 1L all PD-L1
PFS 6.2 vs. 4.8 m
NADIM II 2 Perioperative stage III All All Nivolumab + CT (three cycles) → surgery → nivolumab 6 months pCR 37% vs. 7% Not yet
PFS (24 m) 67.2% vs. 40.9%
KEYNOTE-671 3 Perioperative stage II–III All All Pembrolizumab + CT (four cycles) → surgery → pembrolizumab 1 year pCR 30.2% vs. 11.0% Not yet
OS (24 m) 80.9% vs. 77.6%

NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; CT, chemotherapy; 1L, first-line; DFS, disease-free survival; m, months; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; pCR, pathological complete response.

The first study, the PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091 trial, evaluated the efficacy of pembrolizumab in resected stage IB-IIIA (≥4 cm) NSCLC (3). This study showed favourable data for the use of pembrolizumab in this setting after adjuvant chemotherapy, with disease-free survival (DFS) of 58.7 vs. 34.9 months (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60–0.89). In patients without adjuvant chemotherapy, no difference was observed between the pembrolizumab group and placebo (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.76–2.05). Following these data, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved adjuvant pembrolizumab for use in stage IB (T2a ≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC after platinum-based adjuvant therapy in January 2023.

The other two studies (EMPOWER-Lung 3 and POSEIDON) evaluated the efficacy of immunotherapy in metastatic or advanced NSCLC in combination with chemotherapy (4,5). The EMPOWER-Lung 3 evaluated the efficacy of the combination of platinum-doublet chemotherapy with cemiplimab regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) values (4). The study met its primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) with a median of 21.9 months in the cemiplimab group vs. 13.0 months in the placebo group (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.53–0.93). These data, along with favourable progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) data, led to FDA approval in November 2022 for the combination of platinum-doublet chemotherapy with cemiplimab in advanced or metastatic NSCLC in first-line NSCLC independent of PD-L1 values.

Finally, the POSEIDON trial evaluated the efficacy of the combination of the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab together with the anti-CTLA4 tremelimumab with platinum-doublet chemotherapy (5). One of the primary endpoints of the study was PFS which showed data for the combination of the immunotherapy doublet plus platinum-doublet of 6.2 vs. 4.8 months for chemotherapy alone (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60–0.86). The other primary endpoint was OS and this was also met with data of 14.0 vs. 11.7 months (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65–0.92) respectively. Based on these data, durvalumab, tremelimumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic NSCLC were approved by the FDA in November 2022 for first-line independent of PD-L1 values.

In addition to the previously mentioned clinical trials, the results of the NADIM II trial have recently been published (6). This study evaluated the efficacy of nivolumab plus chemotherapy in the perioperative treatment of stage III NSCLC. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate after three induction cycles was 37% in the nivolumab group vs. 7% in the placebo group (relative risk, 5.34; 95% CI: 1.34–21.23). Subsequently, PFS at 24 months was 67.2% vs. 40.9% respectively (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.25–0.88). Perioperative treatment with immunotherapy in stage III NSCLC is likely to be approved in the short term. Similarly, the KEYNOTE-671 (7) clinical trial evaluated pembrolizumab treatment in the same indication as NADIM II. This study showed a pCR of 30.2% in the pembrolizumab arm vs. 11.0% for placebo (P<0.001). OS at 24 months was 80.9% vs. 77.6% (P=0.02). This indication will also receive approval in the short term by the main agencies.

In conclusion, immunotherapy in NSCLC is in a constant process of evolution that is radically changing the treatment of these tumours with survival and response rates that were unimaginable less than a decade ago.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was a standard submission to the journal. The article has undergone external peer review.

Peer Review File: Available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-23-1854/prf

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-23-1854/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Olivares-Hernández A, González Del Portillo E, Tamayo-Velasco Á, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: from current perspectives to future treatments-a systematic review. Ann Transl Med 2023;11:354. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Reck M, Remon J, Hellmann MD. First-Line Immunotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:586-97. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. O'Brien M, Paz-Ares L, Marreaud S, et al. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091): an interim analysis of a randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022;23:1274-86. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Gogishvili M, Melkadze T, Makharadze T, et al. Cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Nat Med 2022;28:2374-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Johnson ML, Cho BC, Luft A, et al. Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III POSEIDON Study. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:1213-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Provencio M, Nadal E, González-Larriba JL, et al. Perioperative Nivolumab and Chemotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2023;389:504-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Wakelee H, Liberman M, Kato T, et al. Perioperative Pembrolizumab for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2023;389:491-503. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Olivares-Hernández A, del Barco-Morillo E, Miramontes-González JP. New developments and updates in non-small cell lung cancer and immunotherapy: adjuvant, neoadjuvant and advanced stages. Ann Transl Med 2023;11(12):423. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1854

Download Citation