AB015. How does obesity impair the duration of mechanical ventilation in postoperative cardiac surgery patients?
Abstract

AB015. How does obesity impair the duration of mechanical ventilation in postoperative cardiac surgery patients?

Fotini Ampatzidou1, Toros Tsermakian2, Athanasios Madesis1, Theodoros Karaiskos1, George Drossos1

1Cardiothoracic Department, General Hospital “G. Papanikolaou”, Thessaloniki, Greece;2Medical School Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece


Background: To investigate whether obesity impairs the duration of mechanical ventilation in postoperative cardiac surgery patients.

Methods: A total of 1,739 patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery procedures under the use of cardiopulmonary bypass from May 2012 to September 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Body mass index (BMI) was used to classify patients in categories (WHO classification). The total hours of postoperative mechanical ventilation have been correlated with the 3 obesity stages (obese class I, II, III). The non-parametric test of Kruskal-Wallis was used for the statistical analysis Also, obesity in all stages has been correlated with prolonged mechanical ventilation defined as ventilation of more than >24 h by the use of chi-square test

Results: Analysis revealed statistical significant correlation between prolonged ventilation (>24 hours) and all stages of obesity (χ2=8,311, P<0.05). After Kruskal-Wallis analysis between hours of mechanical ventilation and each stage of obesity no correlation was found

Conclusions: Duration in hours of postoperative mechanical ventilation has no correlation with any obesity stage. The incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation (>24 hours) is higher in obese patients.

Keywords: Mechanical ventilation; obesity; cardiac surgery


doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.AB015


Cite this abstract as: Ampatzidou F, Tsermakian T, Madesis A, Karaiskos T, Drossos G. How does obesity impair the duration of mechanical ventilation in postoperative cardiac surgery patients? Ann Transl Med 2016;4(22):AB015. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.AB0615

Download Citation