Does pretreatment elevated calcitonin level cause the poor prognosis in patients with medullary thyroid cancer?
Introduction
Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is an aggressive tumor originating from the parafollicular C cells and accounts for approximately 5% of all thyroid cancers (1). Although the available screening test and treatment methods reportedly enhance the quality of life for MTC patients, the prognosis of patients with advanced stages or recurrence remains poor (2). Thus, surgery and monitoring biomarkers underlying MTC progression are important. There are many indicators that affect prognosis, including genetics, tumor pathology, etc., but only serological indicators are the easiest and most direct way to monitor and evaluate prognosis.
Calcitonin (Ctn) is a 32 amino acid peptide hormone secreted by parafollicular cells. Ctn is a commonly used biomarker of MTC (3). Routine basal serum Ctn measurement is valuable for detection of MTC in the management of patients with thyroid nodules (4-6). The American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines (2) recommend preoperative serum Ctn screening for thyroid malignancies suspected of MTC, and the Chinese MTC guidelines advocate routine preoperative serum Ctn testing for all thyroid malignancies (7). Further, preoperative serum Ctn (8,9) is an important indicator of lymph node metastasis (LNM), which is key for prognosis (10). Thus, the preoperative serum Ctn value is of concern. In clinical practice, postoperative Ctn (11,12), especially the doubling time (13), can be used for postoperative management and prognosis of MTC. The ATA guidelines (2) incorporate postoperative serum Ctn level and its doubling time into the postoperative evaluation and monitoring of MTC. A long-term follow-up study (14) monitored MTC patients for more than 10 years and found that tumor growth was accelerated if the postoperative serum Ctn doubling time was short. Therefore, postoperative serum Ctn could represent a biochemical prognosis for MTC patients. However, there are few studies on preoperative ctn and biochemical prognosis of MTC patients.
In the present study, we aimed to demonstrate the clinical significance of Ctn in patients with MTC and found that increased Ctn levels predicted poor tumor/node/metastasis (TNM) stage and biochemical prognosis of these patients. We present the following article in accordance with the STARD reporting checklist (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-2737/rc).
Methods
Design study
This is a retrospective observational study of China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, China, from 2010 to 2020.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China-Japan Union Hospital (No. 2020010827). Informed consent was taken from all the patients.
MTC diagnosis
Tumor tissue samples collected for histological analysis or surgical resection were obtained from all patients. MTC diagnosis was based on the ATA guidelines (2).
Subjects and data collection
All MTC patient data were collected by thyroid surgery doctors. After exclusion, 77 patients with complete data and follow-up, including serum Ctn levels and clinical and histopathological data, were included in the study (Figure 1). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (I) patients consecutively enrolled and diagnosed with primary MTC for the first time; (II) diagnosis confirmed by histological analysis and imaging methods; and (III) follow-up of more than 6 months with complete information.
Measurement of biomarkers and factors
Detection of Ctn and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was performed by chemiluminescence [Ctn (ref.: LKCL1) and CEA (ref.: 7K68-78)] using the IMMULITE 1000 Immunoassay System (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Normal ranges of Ctn levels were 0.15–6.00 pg/mL for females and 0.15–9.20 pg/mL for males. The upper limit of detection was 585.0 pg/mL. Normal range of CEA was 0.5–9.60 ng/mL. Tumor size was the largest diameter of the tumor measured by pathological examination after surgery. Postoperative Ctn assessment was carried out at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. The end of follow-up is December 30, 2020, the follow-up time was 8–128 months, and the median follow-up time was 65 months.
Outcomes measured
As illustrated in Table S1, the patients were divided into three groups based on postoperative serum Ctn level (2,15). Remission: the postoperative Ctn levels of patients fell to normal levels and remained steady. Stable: the postoperative Ctn levels of patients were stable but did not fall to normal levels. Progression: the postoperative Ctn level of patients increased to 150 pg/mL or the doubling time was less than 12 months.
Statistical analysis
SPSS package version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was applied to analyze all the data. All results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median, and interquartile range (IQR) or count (percentage). Fisher’s exact test and rank sum test were used to analyze categorical variables. Continuous variables were analyzed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and post-hoc ANOVA was used when appropriate. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for nonnormal distributions. To predict the biochemical prognosis of MTC, binary logistic regression models were created, and factors contributing to the outcome in the univariate analysis had a P<0.05. A P<0.05 was considered significant. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to illustrate diagnostic ability.
Results
Characteristics of all patients
Complete data were available for 77 of 101 patients (Figure 1). Table 1 summarizes patient and tumor characteristics. The study included 32 males and 45 females, with a 1:1.4 male-to-female ratio. Mean age at diagnosis was 48.0±12.1 (range, 21–76) years, and 28.6% of patients were aged greater than 55 years. Body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis was 22.80±0.32 kg/m2. Median follow-up duration was 65 (range, 8–128) months. The median of serum Ctn and CEA before surgery were 145.96 pg/mL and 16.35 µg/L, respectively.
Table 1
Features | N (%) |
---|---|
Total, n | 77 |
Gender | |
Men | 32 (41.6) |
Women | 45 (58.4) |
Age at diagnosis (years) | |
Mean ± SD | 48.0±12.1 |
≤55 | 55 (71.4) |
>55 | 22 (28.6) |
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 22.80±0.32 |
Ctn (pg/mL), median (IQR) | 145.96 (15.30, 585.00) |
CEA (µg/L), median (IQR) | 16.35 (5.20, 73.28) |
Multifocal MTC | |
No | 63 (81.8) |
Yes | 14 (18.2) |
Tumor site | |
Median (IQR) | 1.10 (0.60, 2.40) |
Left | 31 (40.2) |
Right | 38 (49.4) |
Bilateral | 8 (10.4) |
Tumor diameter (cm) | |
Median (IQR) | 1.1 (0.6, 2.4) |
≤1 | 36 (46.8) |
1–≤2 | 19 (28.3) |
2–≤4 | 16 (18.5) |
>4 | 6 (9.8) |
N stage | |
N0 | 38 (49.4) |
N1a | 11 (14.3) |
N1b | 28 (36.4) |
TNM stage | |
Stage I/II | 38 (49.4) |
Stage III | 11 (14.3) |
Stage IV | 28 (36.4) |
Extrathyroidal extension | |
No | 71 (92.2) |
Yes | 6 (7.8) |
Hashimoto’s thyroiditis | |
No | 73 (94.8) |
Yes | 4 (5.2) |
Type of thyroid operation | |
Lobectomy | 8 (10.4) |
Lobectomy + contralateral subtotal | 8 (10.4) |
Total | 61 (79.2) |
Type of lymph node operation | |
No | 1 (1.3) |
CLND | 25 (32.5) |
CLND + ipsilateral LND | 43 (55.8) |
CLND + bilateral LND | 8 (10.4) |
Follow-up time (months), median (IQR) | 65.0 (34.5, 92.5) |
SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; Ctn, calcitonin; IQR, interquartile range; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; TNM, tumor/node/metastasis; CLND, central lymph node dissection; LND, lymph node dissection.
Sixty-one cases (79.2%) underwent total thyroidectomy, and the median of the largest tumor size of the MTC was 1.1 cm. Seventy-six (99%) patients underwent lymph node dissection (LND), among which 25 (32.5%) underwent central LND (CLND), 43 (55.8%) patients underwent CLND + ipsilateral LND, and 8 (10.4%) underwent CLND + bilateral LND. Of the 77 enrolled patients, there were 38 (49.4%) without LNM. Based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, MTC patients were classified into TNM stage I/II (38, 49.4%), TNM stage III (11, 14.3%), and TNM stage IV (28, 36.4%).
A total of 63 (81.8%) patients had a single tumor, 14 patients (18.2%) showed multifocal tumors, and 8 patients (10.4%) had tumors located in the bilateral thyroid lobes. For cases with unilateral lesions, 31 (40.2%) were identified in the left lobe and 38 (49.4%) in the right lobe. Extrathyroidal extension and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis were identified in 6 patients (7.8%) and 4 patients (5.2%), respectively.
Relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and TNM stage
The relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and TNM stage are shown in Table 2. Multifocality (P=0.013) and tumor distribution in both thyroid lobes (P=0.042) were associated with a higher stage. No significant association was observed between TNM stage and sex, age, BMI, extrathyroidal extension, and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Preoperative serum Ctn level was positively associated with the TNM stage. We did not find a correlation between preoperative serum CEA levels and TNM stage. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative serum Ctn level (P<0.001) was an independent factor for TNM stage (Table S2).
Table 2
Features | Stage I/II | Stage III | Stage IV | χ2 value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender, n (%) | 0.487 | 0.485 | |||
Men | 17 (44.7) | 5 (45.5) | 10 (35.7) | ||
Women | 21 (55.3) | 6 (54.5) | 18 (64.3) | ||
Age (years), n (%) | 0.552 | 0.457 | |||
≤55 | 28 (73.7) | 9 (81.8) | 18 (64.3) | ||
>55 | 10 (26.3) | 2 (18.2) | 10 (35.7) | ||
Age (years), mean ± SD | 49.34±10.45 | 41.64±13.33 | 48.00±12.09 | – | 0.166 |
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 22.93±0.50 | 22.31±0.61 | 22.82±0.53 | – | 0.818 |
Multifocal MTC, n (%) | 6.225 | 0.013 | |||
No | 35 (92.1) | 9 (81.8) | 19 (67.9) | ||
Yes | 3 (7.9) | 2 (18.2) | 9 (32.1) | ||
Tumor site, n (%) | 6.354 | 0.042 | |||
Left | 16 (42.1) | 3 (27.3) | 12 (42.9) | ||
Right | 21 (55.3) | 7 (63.6) | 10 (35.7) | ||
Bilateral | 1 (2.6) | 1 (9.1) | 6 (21.4) | ||
Extrathyroidal extension, n (%) | 0.098 | 0.754 | |||
No | 35 (92.1) | 11 (100.0) | 25 (89.3) | ||
Yes | 3 (7.9) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (10.7) | ||
Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, n (%) | 0.143 | 0.705 | |||
No | 37 (97.4) | 9 (81.2) | 27 (96.4) | ||
Yes | 1 (2.6) | 2 (18.2) | 1 (3.6) | ||
Ctn (pg/mL), median (IQR) | 20.79 (2.27, 165.75) | 65.99 (16, 114.95) | 545.5 (248.64, 585) | 28.640 | <0.001 |
CEA (µg/L), median (IQR) | 6.35 (4.53, 75.83) | 13.90 (5.10, 19.50) | 34.40 (8.90, 126.7) | 2.903 | 0.234 |
TNM, tumor/node/metastasis; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; Ctn, calcitonin; IQR, interquartile range; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.
Analysis between the clinicopathological factors and postoperative serum Ctn levels
None of the conventional clinicopathological characteristics, such as sex, age, BMI, extrathyroidal extension, or Hashimoto’s thyroiditis were significantly correlated with change in postoperative serum Ctn levels (Table 3). Patients with multifocal lesions (P=0.025), bilateral lesions (P=0.008), and high stage (P<0.001) were more likely to have postoperative biochemical progression. Postoperative serum Ctn levels worsened as preoperative serum Ctn (P<0.001) or CEA (P=0.05) levels increased. The extent of resection of thyroid lobe had no effect on postoperative Ctn levels. However, less than half of the patients in the remission group underwent CLND + lateral LND (ipsilateral LND or bilateral LND), while 80% of patients in the progression group underwent CLND + lateral LND (P=0.047).
Table 3
Features | Remission | Stable | Progression | χ2 value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender, n (%) | 0.041 | 0.839 | |||
Men | 21 (42.0) | 1 (14.3) | 10 (50.0) | ||
Women | 29 (58.0) | 6 (85.7) | 10 (50.0) | ||
Age (years), n (%) | |||||
≤55 | 36 (72.0) | 4 (57.1) | 15 (75.0) | <0.001 | 0.984 |
>55 | 14 (28.0) | 3 (42.9) | 5 (25.0) | ||
Age (years), mean ± SD | 48.90±1.524 | 47.44±5.798 | 45.95±3.192 | 0.428 | 0.654 |
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR) | 22.7 (20.8, 24.2) | 23.4 (22.5, 24.2) | 23.0 (21.2, 24.6) | 0.937 | 0.626 |
Multifocal MTC, n (%) | 7.109 | 0.025 | |||
No | 44 (88.0) | 3 (42.9) | 16 (80.0) | ||
Yes | 6 (12.0) | 4 (57.1) | 4 (20.0) | ||
Tumor site, n (%) | 12.321 | 0.008 | |||
Left | 21 (42.0) | 2 (28.6) | 8 (40.0) | ||
Right | 27 (54.0) | 1 (14.3) | 10 (50.0) | ||
Bilateral | 2 (4.0) | 4 (57.1) | 2 (10.0) | ||
TNM stage, n (%) | 24.830 | <0.001 | |||
Stage I/II | 35 (70.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (15.0) | ||
Stage III | 7 (14.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (20.0) | ||
Stage IV | 8 (16.0) | 7 (100.0) | 13 (65.0) | ||
Extrathyroidal extension, n (%) | 0.056 | 0.813 | |||
No | 46 (92.0) | 6 (85.7) | 19 (95.0) | ||
Yes | 4 (8.0) | 1 (14.3) | 1 (5.0) | ||
Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, n (%) | 0.107 | 0.743 | |||
No | 47 (94.0) | 7 (100.0) | 19 (95.0) | ||
Yes | 3 (6.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.0) | ||
CEA (µg/L), median (IQR) | 7.2 (4.9, 34.4) | 190.5 (5.9, 374.2) | 39.2 (16.35, 102.1) | 6.005 | 0.05 |
Ctn (pg/mL), median (IQR) | 24.8 (7.3, 178.8) | 506.0 (424.0, 585.0) | 585.0 (208.0, 585.0) | 25.150 | <0.001 |
Type of thyroid operation, n (%) | 1.757 | 0.415 | |||
Lobectomy thyroidectomy | 5 (10.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (15.0) | ||
Lobectomy + contralateral subtotal thyroidectomy | 7 (14.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.0) | ||
Total thyroidectomy | 38 (76.0) | 7 (100.0) | 16 (80.0) | ||
Type of lymphnode operation, n (%) | 7.951 | 0.047 | |||
No | 1 (2.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
CLND | 21 (42.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (20.0) | ||
CLND + ipsilateral LND | 26 (52.0) | 4 (57.1) | 13 (65.0) | ||
CLND + bilateral LND | 2 (4.0) | 3 (42.9) | 3 (15.0) |
SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; TNM, tumor/node/metastasis; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; Ctn, calcitonin; CLND, central lymph node dissection; LND, lymph node dissection.
ROC curves for Ctn in predicting TNM stage and progression
Optimal preoperative serum Ctn cut-off value for predicting TNM III was 45.88 pg/mL (P<0.001; Figure 2A), with a sensitivity of 87.2%, a specificity of 65.8%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.786. The best Ctn cut-off value for predicting TNM IV was 167.00 pg/mL (P<0.001; Figure 2B), with a sensitivity of 92.9%, a specificity of 77.6%, and an AUC of 0.863. Based on the preoperative serum Ctn cut-off values, MTC patients were divided into three groups: <45.88, 45.88–167.00, and >167.00 pg/mL. In order to directly predict the progression of postoperative serum Ctn levels, another ROC curve was drawn. As shown in Figure 2C, the best cut-off value was 195.5 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 80.0%, a specificity of 70.2%, and an AUC of 0.786. Accordingly, the MTC patients were divided into two groups: ≤ 195.5 pg/mL. Consequently, the preoperative serum Ctn level as a continuous variable was changed to a categorical variable. Based on different grouping methods, we analyzed the correlation between preoperative serum Ctn levels and biochemical prognosis and obtained clinically significant results (Table S3).
Logistic regression analysis
Univariate factors (P<0.05) were considered for the multivariate logistic regression, except for surgical factors and CEA (only 36 patients). Preoperative serum Ctn level and TNM stage were independent biochemical prognostic factors (Table 4). For every unit increase in the preoperative serum Ctn level, the risk of postoperative progression increased by 1.004 times (P=0.008), and patients with TNM stage III [hazard ratio (HR) =9.663; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.411, 66.156] were nearly 9.7-fold more likely to progress than those with TNM stage I/II.
Table 4
Remission/stable vs. progression | B | S.E. | Wald | P value | HR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | |||||
Multifocal MTC | |||||
No | Ref. | ||||
Yes | 0.021 | 1.109 | 0.000 | 0.985 | 1.022 (0.116, 8.982) |
Tumor site | |||||
Bilateral | Ref. | ||||
Left | 0.847 | 1.433 | 0.349 | 0.555 | 2.004 (0.141, 38.667) |
Right | 0.961 | 1.374 | 0.490 | 0.484 | 2.520 (0.177, 38.653) |
TNM stage | |||||
Stage I/II | Ref. | ||||
Stage III | 2.268 | 0.982 | 5.341 | 0.021 | 9.663 (1.411, 66.156) |
Stage IV | 1.478 | 0.831 | 3.202 | 0.074 | 4.424 (0.868, 22.555) |
Ctn (pg/mL) | 0.004 | 0.002 | 7.116 | 0.008 | 1.004 (1.001, 1.007) |
Model 2 | |||||
Multifocal MTC | |||||
No | Ref. | ||||
Yes | 0.469 | 1.149 | 0.166 | 0.683 | 1.598 (0.168, 15.192) |
Tumor site | |||||
Bilateral | Ref. | ||||
Left | 1.432 | 1.477 | 0.941 | 0.332 | 4.189 (0.232, 75.711) |
Right | 1.283 | 1.406 | 0.833 | 0.361 | 3.609 (0.230, 56.748) |
TNM stage | |||||
Stage I/II | Ref. | ||||
Stage III | 2.444 | 1.030 | 5.632 | 0.018 | 11.521 (1.530, 86.729) |
Stage IV | 1.381 | 0.840 | 2.704 | 0.100 | 3.980 (0.767, 20.645) |
Ctn (pg/mL) | |||||
≤195.5 | Ref. | ||||
>195.5 | 2.333 | 0.893 | 6.828 | 0.009 | 10.307 (1.792, 59.296) |
Model 3 | |||||
Multifocal MTC | |||||
No | Ref. | ||||
Yes | −0.024 | 1.094 | 0.000 | 0.983 | 0.977 (0.114, 8.331) |
Tumor site | |||||
Bilateral | Ref. | ||||
Left | 1.332 | 1.402 | 0.888 | 0.346 | 3.749 (0.240, 58.575) |
Right | 0.955 | 1.320 | 0.523 | 0.469 | 2.598 (0.196, 34.495) |
TNM stage | |||||
Stage I/II | Ref. | ||||
Stage III | 2.646 | 1.261 | 4.403 | 0.036 | 14.101 (1.191, 167.000) |
Stage IV | 1.044 | 0.837 | 1.556 | 0.212 | 2.840 (0.551, 14.636) |
Ctn (pg/mL) | |||||
<45.88 | Ref. | ||||
45.88–167.00 | 1.408 | 1.435 | 0.963 | 0.326 | 4.086 (0.246, 67.988) |
>167.00 | 3.572 | 1.411 | 6.412 | 0.011 | 35.604 (2.242, 565.476) |
MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; TNM, tumor/node/metastasis; Ctn, calcitonin; S.E., standard error; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
We also established 2 logistic regression models using Ctn as a categorical variable (Table 4). Similarly, both preoperative serum Ctn level and TNM stage could independently predict biochemical prognosis. In model 2, patients with higher preoperative Ctn levels (>195.5) were nearly 10.3 times more likely to progress than those with lower preoperative serum Ctn levels (≤195.5 pg/mL) (HR =10.307; 95% CI: 1.792, 59.296). In model 3, compared with the control group (<45.88 pg/mL), patients with preoperative serum Ctn levels of >167.00 pg/mL had a greater risk of progression. However, this phenomenon was not observed in the 45.88–167.00 pg/mL group.
Discussion
In this study, we analyzed the correlation between preoperative serum Ctn levels and change in postoperative serum Ctn levels as well as TNM stage in 77 patients with MTC. In the present observational study, we demonstrated that Ctn was correlated with clinical outcomes and TNM stage in patients with MTC. Preoperative serum Ctn level was an independent factor for postoperative serum Ctn progression as well as for TNM stage. In addition, we found preoperative serum Ctn levels could be potentially used as an important parameter to supplement TNM stage to predict biochemical prognosis. The findings of this study suggest that preoperative serum Ctn level plays a key role in preliminary clinical diagnosis, surgical decision making, and prognosis prediction.
A comprehensive analysis (16) of 72,368 patients with thyroid nodules at 16 institutions verified that if the serum Ctn level was ≥10 pg/mL, the sensitivity for diagnosing MTC was 100% and the specificity was 97.2%. Since serum Ctn levels can be affected by sex, Allelein et al. (17) conducted a sex subgroup analysis and found that the best serum Ctn level thresholds for identifying male and female MTC were 46 pg/mL and 35 pg/mL, respectively. In addition, Weber et al. (18) reported that the cut-off levels for the diagnosis of MTC were 7.9 pg/mL for females and 15 pg/mL for males. The application of serum Ctn levels has greatly helped in the diagnosis of MTC, especially in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) (19). Calcium stimulation (20,21) and pentagastrin (PG) (20,22) can be used to assist Ctn in differentiating C cell proliferation and MTC. Our previous study (23) showed that tumor diameter was strongly correlated with preoperative serum Ctn level (r=0.611) and moderately correlated with preoperative serum CEA level (r=0.482). Yip et al. (24) proposed that tumor diameter had strong positive correlations with preoperative serum Ctn level but had moderate positive correlations with preoperative serum CEA level. Preoperative serum Ctn level can be used to evaluate tumor characteristics more accurately than preoperative CEA level can. A previous study (23) analyzed the effect of postoperative serum Ctn levels on disease-free survival in MTC patients. Patients in the progressive group had poorer disease-free survival and postoperative serum Ctn level was more sensitive than postoperative serum CEA level, proving that postoperative serum Ctn level could better reflect the prognosis of patients with MTC.
As both TNM stage and postoperative Ctn levels are prognostic factors, we speculated that preoperative serum Ctn levels could predict prognosis by predicting postoperative serum Ctn levels and TNM stage. In this study, we validated that preoperative serum Ctn level was an independent factor in TNM stage, but no correlation between preoperative serum CEA level and TNM stage was observed. This might be due to the small number of CEA samples. Patients with multifocal lesions, bilateral lesions, high stage, and high preoperative serum Ctn and CEA levels were more likely to have postoperative biochemical progression. Consistent with the results reported by Yip et al. (24), only preoperative serum Ctn level and TNM stage were independent factors that affected postoperative serum Ctn levels. Ito et al. (25) demonstrated that preoperative Ctn level, preoperative CEA level, and TNM stage were negatively correlated with biochemical cure. This study also found that the larger the range of LND, the worse the biochemical prognosis in patients with MTC. This may because patients with higher preoperative disease burdens might choose more aggressive surgical approaches.
To guide clinical practice and explain the data clearly, cut-off values were obtained by plotting ROC curves. The best cut-off value of preoperative serum Ctn levels for predicting stage III and stage IV were 45.88 and 167.00 pg/mL, respectively, and the optimal cut-off point value for predicting biochemical progression was 195.5 pg/mL. Although the sensitivity and specificity of these cut-off values were slightly lower, the cut-off value for predicting TNM IV was 167 pg/mL with a high sensitivity of 0.929. In patients with TNM IV, lateral LNM always occurs, so the high sensitivity value of 167 pg/mL is essential for guiding surgery. In comparison, Park et al. (26) used a cut-off value of 300 pg/mL for ipsilateral LNM with a positive and negative likelihood ratio of 0.18. We believed that the value of 167 pg/mL in our center was more suitable for determining the optimal initial surgical range. In addition, Park et al. (27) also indicated that the preoperative serum Ctn cut-off value that predicted structural recurrence was 309 pg/mL. In general, biochemical recurrence tends to occur earlier than structural recurrence. Our results matched it exactly, and the optimal cut-off point value for predicting biochemical progression was 195.5 pg/mL.
As a result, preoperative serum Ctn level was converted from a continuous variable to a categorical variable. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the progression of postoperative serum Ctn levels was established again. We found that TNM stage IV could not independently predict the biochemical prognosis in these 3 models. However, in model 3, the cut-off value of 167.00 pg/mL made by TNM stage IV became the index for biochemical prognosis, although we did not find this function in the 45.88−167.00 pg/mL group. Therefore, we speculated whether preoperative Ctn level could be included in the TNM stage, especially TNM stage IV. Similarly, Machens and Dralle (10) believed that the number of lymph nodes was an important prognostic classifier that should be incorporated into MTC staging systems. Although the TNM staging system has good predictive performance, it is still insufficient. Park et al. (28) found that compared with TNM-7, the 8th TNM edition did not improve predictive performance of MTC patients. Wang et al. (29) modified TNM-8 and obtained a more accurate risk stratification. Ye et al. (30) reported that serum markers, especially preoperative serum Ctn levels, could be an indicator for guiding clinical strategy in the future. Therefore, based on the above results, we proposed that the inclusion of preoperative serum Ctn level into the TNM stage classification might improve predictive performance in MTC patients.
Postoperative monitoring in MTC patients is crucial due to the poor prognosis and high recurrence rate (2). Our previous study (23) proved that postoperative serum Ctn level could be used to evaluate prognosis. Preoperative serum Ctn level could independently predict the postoperative serum Ctn level, indicating that the preoperative serum Ctn level also had a guiding significance for prognosis. Serum Ctn levels have long been of interest to researchers. Machens et al. (31) reported that preoperative serum Ctn levels affected the time that postoperative serum Ctn took to reach normal levels. Chen et al. (32) suggested that the postoperative serum Ctn/preoperative serum Ctn ratio was an independent factor influencing the prognosis of patients with MTC. That is to say, in addition to the postoperative serum Ctn level, the preoperative serum Ctn level is also of great significance for evaluating the prognosis of MTC patients. The combination of the 2 levels with assessment of the patients’ condition could dynamically provide more accurate diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis in MTC patients.
This study had some limitations. First, this was a retrospective, single-center study. Our data may not necessarily be generalizable to other centers because of the different kits used for serum Ctn level determination. Second, the upper limit of serum Ctn was 585.00 pg/mL. This may lead to some bias, especially in the cut-off value. Finally, the sample size was small, and further studies are required in larger populations to verify our results.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank all the clinicians in the Thyroid Surgery of China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University for their support.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81972499, 81702651), the Jilin University Bethune Project (Nos. 2020B49, 2020B14), the Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Program (Nos. 20190201275JC, 20190201225JC), and the Program of Jilin Provincial Finance Department (No. 2020SCZ03).
Footnote
Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STARD reporting checklist. Available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-2737/rc
Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-2737/dss
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-2737/coif). DZ reports funding support from the Jilin University Bethune Project (No. 2020B49), and the Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Program (No. 20190201225JC). NL reports funding support from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 81702651) and the Jilin University Bethune Project (No. 2020B14). HS reports funding support from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 81972499), the Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Program (No. 20190201275JC), and the Program of Jilin Provincial Finance Department (No. 2020SCZ03). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China-Japan Union Hospital (No. 2020010827). Informed consent was taken from all the patients.
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
References
- Dal Maso L, Tavilla A, Pacini F, et al. Survival of 86,690 patients with thyroid cancer: A population-based study in 29 European countries from EUROCARE-5. Eur J Cancer 2017;77:140-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wells SA Jr, Asa SL, Dralle H, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2015;25:567-610. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bae YJ, Schaab M, Kratzsch J. Calcitonin as Biomarker for the Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Recent Results Cancer Res 2015;204:117-37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Vardarli I, Weber M, Weidemann F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of routine calcitonin measurement for the detection of medullary thyroid carcinoma in the management of patients with nodular thyroid disease: a meta-analysis. Endocr Connect 2021;10:358-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Trimboli P, Camponovo C, Ruinelli L. The dilemma of routine testing for calcitonin thyroid nodule's patients to detect or exclude medullary carcinoma: one single negative test should be valuable as rule-out strategy to avoid further calcitonin measurements over time. Endocrine 2022; Epub ahead of print. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sencar ME, Hepsen S, Çalapkulu M, et al. The value of routine measurement of serum calcitonin on insufficient, indeterminate, and suspicious thyroid nodule cytology. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2022;22:118-23. [PubMed]
- Chinese Thyroid Association, Chinese Collage of Surgeons Chinese Medical Doctor Association. China Anti-Cancer Association, the Society of Thyroid Cancer; Chinese Research Hospital Association Thyroid Disease Committee. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of medullary thyroid carcinoma (2020 edition). Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery 2020;40:1012-20.
- Woliński K, Kaznowski J, Klimowicz A, et al. Diagnostic value of selected biochemical markers in the detection of recurrence of medullary thyroid cancer - comparison of calcitonin, procalcitonin, chromogranin A, and carcinoembryonic antigen. Endokrynol Pol 2017;68:434-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bae SY, Jung SP, Choe JH, et al. Prediction of lateral neck lymph node metastasis according to preoperative calcitonin level and tumor size for medullary thyroid carcinoma. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2019;35:772-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Machens A, Dralle H. Prognostic impact of N staging in 715 medullary thyroid cancer patients: proposal for a revised staging system. Ann Surg 2013;257:323-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Meijer JA, le Cessie S, van den Hout WB, et al. Calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen doubling times as prognostic factors in medullary thyroid carcinoma: a structured meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2010;72:534-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fanget F, Demarchi MS, Maillard L, et al. Medullary thyroid cancer outcomes in patients with undetectable versus normalized postoperative calcitonin levels. Br J Surg 2021;108:1064-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Yang JH, Camacho CP, Lindsey SC, et al. The combined use of calcitonin doubling time and 18F-FDG PET/CT improves prognostic values in medullary thyroid carcinoma: the clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT. Endocr Pract 2017;23:942-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Miyauchi A, Kudo T, Kihara M, et al. Spontaneous Deceleration and Acceleration of Growth Rate in Medullary Thyroid Carcinomas Suggested by Changes in Calcitonin Doubling Times Over Long-Term Surveillance. World J Surg 2019;43:504-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Saltiki K, Simeakis G, Anagnostou E, et al. Different outcomes in sporadic versus familial medullary thyroid cancer. Head Neck 2019;41:154-61. [PubMed]
- Verbeek HH, de Groot JWB, Sluiter WJ, et al. Calcitonin testing for detection of medullary thyroid cancer in people with thyroid nodules. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;3:CD010159. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Allelein S, Ehlers M, Morneau C, et al. Measurement of Basal Serum Calcitonin for the Diagnosis of Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Horm Metab Res 2018;50:23-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Weber T, Poplawski A, Vorländer C, et al. Preoperative calcitonin testing improves the diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma in female and male patients. Eur J Endocrinol 2022;186:223-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Trimboli P, Giannelli J, Marques B, et al. Head-to-head comparison of FNA cytology vs. calcitonin measurement in FNA washout fluids (FNA-CT) to diagnose medullary thyroid carcinoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine 2022;75:33-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fugazzola L, Di Stefano M, Censi S, et al. Basal and stimulated calcitonin for the diagnosis of medullary thyroid cancer: updated thresholds and safety assessment. J Endocrinol Invest 2021;44:587-97. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Băetu M, Olariu CA, Stancu C, et al. Thresholds of Basal- and Calcium-Stimulated Calcitonin for Diagnosis of Thyroid Malignancy. Horm Metab Res 2021;53:779-86. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fugazzola L. Baseline and stimulated calcitonin: Thresholds for the diagnosis of medullary thyroid cancer. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2019;80:191-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zhang DQ, Zhang H, Sui CQ, et al. Study on changes of calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen in perioperative period of medullary thyroid carcinoma: an analysis of 92 cases. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery 2020;40:1062-8.
- Yip DT, Hassan M, Pazaitou-Panayiotou K, et al. Preoperative basal calcitonin and tumor stage correlate with postoperative calcitonin normalization in patients undergoing initial surgical management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Surgery 2011;150:1168-77. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Kihara M, et al. Static Prognostic Factors and Appropriate Surgical Designs for Patients with Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: The Second Report from a Single-Institution Study in Japan. World J Surg 2018;42:3954-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Park H, Park J, Choi MS, et al. Preoperative Serum Calcitonin and Its Correlation with Extent of Lymph Node Metastasis in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:2894. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Park H, Park SY, Park J, et al. Prognostic Value of Preoperative Serum Calcitonin Levels for Predicting the Recurrence of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:749973. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Park SY, Cho YY, Kim HI, et al. Clinical Validation of the Prognostic Stage Groups of the Eighth-Edition TNM Staging for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018;103:4609-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wang M, Hu D, Zeng W, et al. New proposed tumor-node-metastasis staging system for medullary thyroid carcinoma based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Am J Transl Res 2020;12:2703-10. [PubMed]
- Ye L, Zhou X, Lu J, et al. Combining serum calcitonin, carcinoembryonic antigen, and neuron-specific enolase to predict lateral lymph node metastasis in medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Lab Anal 2020;34:e23278. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Machens A, Lorenz K, Dralle H. Time to calcitonin normalization after surgery for node-negative and node-positive medullary thyroid cancer. Br J Surg 2019;106:412-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Chen L, Sun W, Qian K, et al. High Ratio of Early Postoperative Calcitonin to Preoperative Calcitonin Could be a Novel Indicator of Poor Prognosis in Patients with Biochemical Incomplete Responses in Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Endocr Pract 2020;26:738-47. [Crossref] [PubMed]
(English Language Editor: A. Muijlwijk)