This series of Annals of Translational Medicine presents a collection of review articles on hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill patient. The limits and scopes of hemodynamic monitoring has broadened over the last decades with the incorporation of new less invasive techniques such as bedside point-of-care echocardiography. On the other hand, resuscitation concepts have changed and moved from a cardiac output centered approach to perfusion-driven strategies.
Editorial on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
Editorial for the series on hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients
Original Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
Hypoxia-related parameters during septic shock resuscitation: Pathophysiological determinants and potential clinical implications
Transesophageal echocardiography instead or in addition to transthoracic echocardiography in evaluating haemodynamic problems in intubated critically ill patients
A novel supplemental maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: blood pump-out test performed before renal replacement therapy
Evaluation of radial artery pulse pressure effects on detection of stroke volume changes after volume loading maneuvers in cardiac surgical patients
Review Article on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients1
Fluid administration for acute circulatory dysfunction using basic monitoring
Optimal target in septic shock resuscitation
Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients
Hemodynamic monitoring using trans esophageal echocardiography in patients with shock
Hemodynamic monitoring in patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate
Vasopressors in septic shock: which, when, and how much?
Understanding ventriculo-arterial coupling
Inodilators in septic shock: should these be used?
Continuous cardiac output assessment or serial echocardiography during septic shock resuscitation?
Case Report on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients1
Intraoperative venous air embolism in the non-cardiac surgery-the role of perioperative echocardiography in a case series report
Editorial Commentary on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
Predicting fluid responsiveness with the passive leg raising test: don’t be fooled by intra-abdominal hypertension!
Interpretation or misinterpretation of clinical trials on septic shock: about the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial
The passive leg raising under pressure: focus on the impact of intra-abdominal hypertension
When data interpretation should not rely on the magnitude of P values: the example of ANDROMEDA SHOCK trial
Microcirculation and mean arterial pressure: friends or foes?
The Bayesian approach: may we learn a lesson from the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial?
Letter to the editor on Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients1